PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
^TNX vs. RYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^TNX vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
70.97%
26.05%
^TNX
RYLD

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^TNX achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 9.12% return.


^TNX

YTD

14.54%

1M

8.72%

6M

0.18%

1Y

-0.29%

5Y (annualized)

20.00%

10Y (annualized)

6.64%

RYLD

YTD

9.12%

1M

1.01%

6M

6.41%

1Y

12.33%

5Y (annualized)

3.40%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


^TNXRYLD
Sharpe Ratio-0.101.22
Sortino Ratio0.021.76
Omega Ratio1.001.24
Calmar Ratio-0.040.70
Martin Ratio-0.217.31
Ulcer Index11.00%1.70%
Daily Std Dev23.02%10.18%
Max Drawdown-93.78%-41.53%
Current Drawdown-44.81%-7.55%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between ^TNX and RYLD is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

^TNX vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.101.22
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.021.76
The chart of Omega ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.801.001.201.401.601.001.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.090.70
The chart of Martin ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at -0.21, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.00-0.217.31
^TNX
RYLD

The current ^TNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^TNX and RYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.10
1.22
^TNX
RYLD

Drawdowns

^TNX vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^TNX drawdown since its inception was -93.78%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^TNX and RYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.23%
-7.55%
^TNX
RYLD

Volatility

^TNX vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 3.84%. This indicates that ^TNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.18%
3.84%
^TNX
RYLD